TexasCHLforum.com

mojo84 wrote:

jerry_r60 wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Apparently, there is much we aren't being told. I suspect it comes down to egos and Straus playing king.

I know he has plenty of power but at least in theory, he should not be able to block HB910 from moving in the Senate. Some on here have questioned why political capital is needed if Republicans hold majorities. Maybe this is why, I guess he could hold other bills hostage if this one moves in the Senate.

I also said "egos". It's not just Straus. I think we have some middle age children running the show.

txcharvel wrote:If our constitutional rights are being regulated, I say that carrying legally in more places takes priority over open carry. As such, I feel that campus carry is more important than open carry.

In fact, I wish open carry was not the issue it's been the past couple of years as it only fuels the unfounded arguments and fears of those that opposed campus carry.

Open carry means nothing to me really, I can still carry concealed. What's important is my children, friends and coworkers being able to protect themselves while at work or in class.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

safety1 wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

safety1 wrote:Mr. Cotton, since you are online, do you have anything new to share with us regarding HB910, SB11 & SB17 ??
Thanks in advance!

Two questions there: 1) is there anything new; and 2) can I share it. Yes, no.

Sorry,
Chas.

I understand sir! Hoping it is good news.

It's very good, if everything goes as planned.

Chas.

I withdraw this statement.

Chas.