TexasCHLforum.com

Beiruty wrote:

G.A. Heath wrote:Charles said it much better than I in his podcast, check it out at https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.com/ ... p/podcasts (specifically episode #12).

To sum it up rather crudely: If your not voting for Trump (not voting at all, doing write in, voting for a third party candidate, or the Democratic Ticket) then you are effectively voting for Hillary and gun control. For the record the candidate I voted for didn't win, but I will hold my nose and pull the handle to keep Hillary from getting her 3rd term.

Simply no other choice. I am 2ndA voter, Period

This.

LSUTiger wrote:

TexasJohnBoy wrote:

bdr518 wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:Maybe Drumpf will prove to be a catalyst for a 3rd party in the future but it's all Drumpf/Hitlary at this point.

There won't be any way a third party will be viable unless we find a way to go "Jungle Primary" similar to how states like Louisiana are.

Write it down -- there will be no viable 3rd party for President any time soon.

I know! I was just trying to use "respectful sympathy" to commiserate with those who are still holding out voting for Trump. I think just bashing them over the head telling them how silly it would be not to vote Trump is not gonna help them realize the best course of action is to vote Trump. A little hand holding will be needed.

bdr518 wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:Maybe Drumpf will prove to be a catalyst for a 3rd party in the future but it's all Drumpf/Hitlary at this point.

There won't be any way a third party will be viable unless we find a way to go "Jungle Primary" similar to how states like Louisiana are.

Write it down -- there will be no viable 3rd party for President any time soon.

Is Trump the best person for the job? Probably not.

How anyone can conclude that you'd rather withhold a vote, and give Hillary the edge? I can't explain.

At least he gives us the impression that the 2nd Amendment would have an attempt to be upheld. She is blatantly said that the Supreme Court got Heller wrong. The next president will tip the balance of the Supreme Court for possibly a generation.

Think about that. You really want to chance it that Hillary Clinton gets to appoint nominees that would sit for the next 30-50 years? Or take a chance on Trump? You KNOW what she's going to do.