TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

montgomery wrote:

bayou wrote:What does 30.06 have to do with the discussion about felonies? If you differ in opinion with the felons not having access to guns that's ok but don't hijack the thread with a trolling comment.

Point is the same guys that want to beat the law by not doing the time are no different than those that beat the 30.06. Same mentality. . .

I'm sick of your insults and your arrogance.

Chas.

I never get sick of your thought provoking, articulate analysis.

bayou wrote:What does 30.06 have to do with the discussion about felonies? If you differ in opinion with the felons not having access to guns that's ok but don't hijack the thread with a trolling comment.

Point is the same guys that want to beat the law by not doing the time are no different than those that beat the 30.06. Same mentality. If you don't want the punishment, don't do the crime. If you don't want to disarm, don't frequent the establishment. Pretty simple.

theHunter wrote:It amazing to me how many of you are ok with committing crime. Most of your arguments boil down to just that.

If you can't do the time don't do the crime. And yes the time includes for the rest of your life if it was a felony.

Crazy beliefs here.

This reminds me of the guys that are always looking for ways to beat the 30.06 signage ...

... bigger crime here is why a Texan would watch [abbreviated profanity deleted] Yankee Marshall, especially after his recent derogatory and inflammatory remarks toward another Texan, Ms. Dana Loesch.