I want to see the causation evidence that Adam Lanza saw all of this marketing which then caused him to murder his mother
and then murder the children at Sandy Hook.
It is my understanding the rifle was sold to his mother--not to him.
Appears to me the case is stacked on pure speculation unless I see something otherwise.
One can of course be cynical and say well some cases just gotta be tried (Kyle Rittenhouse) and some cases gotta be settled (The Sandy Hook lawsuits).
Will the floodgates now open?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE”
- Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:51 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE
- Replies: 237
- Views: 57009
- Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:41 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE
- Replies: 237
- Views: 57009
Re: Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE
Here is another link to the story:
https://www.personaldefenseworld.com/20 ... andy-hook/
Notice the "man card" mention--this is totally ridiculous. The case barely survived the Connecticut Supreme Court (4/3 ruling allowing it to proceed). It is the kind of case our Supreme Court of Texas would toss in a heart-beat.
https://www.personaldefenseworld.com/20 ... andy-hook/
Notice the "man card" mention--this is totally ridiculous. The case barely survived the Connecticut Supreme Court (4/3 ruling allowing it to proceed). It is the kind of case our Supreme Court of Texas would toss in a heart-beat.