I just call her the Liberal gun hating DPS attorney. Counselor Democrat.
She always has the class going
heeheehee
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Always be vigilent.”
- Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:05 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Always be vigilent.
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5879
- Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:14 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Always be vigilent.
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5879
How did you like it? Don't you love their range?Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just attended the DPS CHL Instructor course this Monday through Wednesday. Sgt. Riddle expressly said that verbal disclosure was an "intentional failure to conceal." This was in response to a question from one of the students.txinvestigator wrote:The never said that in either my initial instructor class, nor my instructor renewal class. I also asked my father who has been instructing since 1996, and DPS has never told HIM that either.Charles L. Cotton wrote:[ Apparently, DPS doesn't agree as they teach Instructors that verbal disclosure that you have a gun is a violation.
Chas.
Again, I don't think it is either.
Chas.
I think I'll have to email Riddle. She needs the extra stress.
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Always be vigilent.
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5879
The never said that in either my initial instructor class, nor my instructor renewal class. I also asked my father who has been instructing since 1996, and DPS has never told HIM that either.Charles L. Cotton wrote:[ Apparently, DPS doesn't agree as they teach Instructors that verbal disclosure that you have a gun is a violation.
Chas.
I just polled all of our instructors.......It'll be interesting to read their replies.
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:29 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Always be vigilent.
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5879
I disagree. The law says you must intentionally fail to conceal handgun, not fail to conceal the fact that you are carrying.Charles L. Cotton wrote:We have to be careful about asking someone if they are armed. We could inadvertently cause them to violate TPC §46.035(a) if they have a CHL and respond "yes."
Chas.