Search found 2 matches

by Pariah3j
Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:22 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Not so hypothetical question regarding right to defend...
Replies: 55
Views: 9578

Re: Not so hypothetical question regarding right to defend...

rc-mike wrote:
Pariah3j wrote:What time of day is this hypothetical happening ? It does make the difference for the use of deadly force as I understand it.
Where is this written? I hear it now and then, but I've never seen a law that says you can only shoot at night.

Mike
casp625 quoted this earlier but I'll requote it:
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or
(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.


Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Its not only night time, but using deadly force just because they are burglarizing you isn't always allowed.
by Pariah3j
Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:59 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Not so hypothetical question regarding right to defend...
Replies: 55
Views: 9578

Re: Not so hypothetical question regarding right to defend...

What time of day is this hypothetical happening ? It does make the difference for the use of deadly force as I understand it.

Return to “Not so hypothetical question regarding right to defend...”