TexasCHLforum.com

mojo84 wrote:It didn't say Hogue had already switched to Wells. They just said they had made the decision to work with Wells after Wells pursued them. Suing is way overused and it doesn't sound like there is a ground for a suit. I think publicizing the situation and then utilizing a local or regional bank is the best move.

I also don't believe it's appropriate to view people of color or handicapped persons as "special snowflakes". Too many entitled snowflakes suing people is much to blame on our current situation.

I misread it then, I thought it said after switching to them they dropped them. I don't recommend suing for everything or much to be honest. But a company pursuing you and getting to switch(assuming the switch had already happened) and then dropping your company would be grounds for some sort of compensation I think.

And 'special snowflakes' wasn't necessarily aimed at legitimate protected classes. As you pointed out, its more aimed at some of the more PC additions as of late, and those who just generally think of themselves as deserving some sort of protected status for no good reason.

I wonder if this could potentially open them up to a discrimination lawsuit or something of the like - Hogue is better off with a better bank and someone who will fit their needs. But if it as was stated and Wells Fargo sought their business out and now are trying to drop them, to me that has brought an unnecessary burden upon Hogue. But I'm sure a business or individual practicing their 2A rights doesn't get the same consideration as one of the special snowflake classes.