TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Bitter Clinger wrote:

MadMonkey wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

MadMonkey wrote:

AndyC wrote:Duuuuuude....

I don't like having to disassemble to fit in my backpack

Have you chrono’ed any loads through that stubby barrel? Just curious.

(BTW, don’t tell anyone, but that’s not a pistol anymore. )

Not yet. According to all the things I've read, I should be getting a hair over 1700fps with Barnes 110gr VOR-TX, which should give me an effective range of about 150-200yds, which is exactly what I built the gun for. I want to give some Lehigh Defense loads a try as well.

As for being a pistol... what did I miss? Brace, no VFG...

TAM, sure looks like a pistol to me as well. What are you seeing that leads you to that conclusion? I have virtually the identical set up on more than one firearm. Thanks!

THIS has a rifle stock, therefore it is no longer a pistol:


That is what I was referring to. My son has the nearly identical setup, with the same stock. He had to register the lower for an SBR and get the stamp. BTW, he worked for a NFA dealer for a while and knows what he’s talking about. Only difference is, his is chambered in 5.56, with a 7” barrel.

denwego wrote:

jb2012 wrote:
If it's less than 26" overall length and it has a vertical handgrip, it's an AOW.

If it's more than 26" overall length and it has a vertical handgrip, it's a Title 1 firearm (non-NFA).

If it's more than 26" overall length and it has a vertical handgrip and it's concealed on the person, the ATF says it's an AOW. They're been smacked down in court before over that sort of nonsense, and it's fundamentally the same "use defines reality" garbage they said about Sig Braces with SBRs, but it's still what they say.