Maybe if on something else, based on investigative facts, but Judge already ruled he couldn't testify about the woman's reasonableness. He investigated the scene, not her mental.carlson1 wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:02 pm I bet that defense intends to try and make the Chief Ranger and expert witness when it comes to him testifying for them.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Officer Invades Apartment, Shoots Resident”
- Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:20 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Officer Invades Apartment, Shoots Resident
- Replies: 435
- Views: 244920
Re: Officer Invades Apartment, Shoots Resident
- Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:56 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Officer Invades Apartment, Shoots Resident
- Replies: 435
- Views: 244920
Re: Officer Invades Apartment, Shoots Resident
No, expert witnesses will testify. The Ranger is law enforcement, but he is not an expert on the law. They have many, many code books and lawyers who are. As was stated, in his opinion, but opinions are not facts or expert.C-dub wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:59 pmIf that were the precedent, then wouldn't Guyger be the only one the jury should be allowed to hear from?WildBill wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:26 pmDid the Ranger witness the shooting? If not, that it's his opinion, not evidence.jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:15 pm I have caught bits and pieces of the trial. Mainly reporting on the AM radio. Why did the jury not get to hear the Texas Ranger say she acted reasonably? I haven't seen an explanation why that statement was not in front of the jury.