I wonder if there are procedures in place among the security staff to account for a CHL holder reacting to a threat as well. In a a problem arises situation a CHL holder could be mistaken as an assailant.
Just a thought I had this morning.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Baton Rouge Shooting”
- Mon May 22, 2006 12:40 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Baton Rouge Shooting
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1638
- Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Baton Rouge Shooting
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1638
I think if someone is employed for the purpose of security, or officially in charge of doing so, that it would be in an organization's best interest to have a higher qualification standard, at least for liability purposes.jbirds1210 wrote:If someone is volunteering their service as security and carrying a gun legally, what does it matter? There is really no reason to let anyone know that you are carrying.
txinvestigator can probably offer much more info on this than I can.
-nick
- Sun May 21, 2006 10:54 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Baton Rouge Shooting
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1638
- Sun May 21, 2006 10:36 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Baton Rouge Shooting
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1638
A buddy of mine is on staff at second houston.
Second houston has its own armed security force. During the service, there are armed people on stage in suits with small radios (secret service...what?).
I'm sure there are armed people dispersed throughout the sanctuary. Mega church security is kind of intereseting huh?

Second houston has its own armed security force. During the service, there are armed people on stage in suits with small radios (secret service...what?).
I'm sure there are armed people dispersed throughout the sanctuary. Mega church security is kind of intereseting huh?
