It has always been Federal land. Most Western States where.not like Texas.anygunanywhere wrote:Fed dot gov should not own state land. This is the United States. If the fed dot gov needs land it should buy/lease from the states. The fact that fed dot gov owns a large portion of western lands is insane.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions”
- Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:51 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
- Replies: 34
- Views: 7607
Re: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
- Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:49 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
- Replies: 34
- Views: 7607
Re: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
I see. She set a trial date for four other defendants.Flightmare wrote:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... 013685001/WTR wrote:Then why has a new trial date been set?RoyGBiv wrote:Charges were dismissed "with prejudice". Not a mistrial... Cannot be retried unless there is a new crime alleged.Liberty wrote:OK They got a mistrial.
U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro said a new trial would not be sufficient to address the problems in the case and would provide the prosecution with an unfair advantage going forward. She dismissed the charges against the four men "with prejudice," meaning they cannot face trial again.
- Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:22 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
- Replies: 34
- Views: 7607
Re: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
Then why has a new trial date been set?RoyGBiv wrote:Charges were dismissed "with prejudice". Not a mistrial... Cannot be retried unless there is a new crime alleged.Liberty wrote:OK They got a mistrial.
- Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:27 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
- Replies: 34
- Views: 7607
Re: Acquittal in Bundy Ranch Prosecutions
I've never been selected for a jury. I imagine you have to take an oath to enforce the law. If so, B and C are not what you have sworn to do. If you can't do that, say so and not be chosen to serve .crazy2medic wrote:I believe a juror has the right to decide A. Was the law broken?, B. Is the law being applied fairly? C. Is the law itself fair and constitutional?