Search found 3 matches

by WildBill
Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:43 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 371474

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

RogueUSMC wrote:To my knowledge, Texas law never differentiates between a loaded firearm and an unloaded one...
:iagree:
by WildBill
Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:42 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 371474

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
ELB wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Here goes another Open Records Request to the City. They're wrong and I'm starting to think ORR's are a way to call the bluff of cities pulling this stuff.

Chas.
How does this work? How does an ORR call their bluff? I'd be very interested to know this tactic. Might prove useful some day!

elb
Essentially, you are requiring them to produce documents that support their decision to post 30.06 signs, or that support their opinion that it is an enforceable sign. Quite often, the response is going to be "none" and they really hate having to say that. I plan to use the information in other efforts.

Chas.
If you did get a document what would it be? Meeting minutes talking about posting? A letter from the city attorney?
by WildBill
Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:16 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 371474

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

texasparamedic wrote:This is long but I still need help

Here is my situation... Now to my point.. The front door has a complaint 30.06 on a clear glass door in white letters.
So, what is your question?

Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”