RogueUSMC wrote:To my knowledge, Texas law never differentiates between a loaded firearm and an unloaded one...
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”
- Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:43 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 371474
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:42 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 371474
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
If you did get a document what would it be? Meeting minutes talking about posting? A letter from the city attorney?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Essentially, you are requiring them to produce documents that support their decision to post 30.06 signs, or that support their opinion that it is an enforceable sign. Quite often, the response is going to be "none" and they really hate having to say that. I plan to use the information in other efforts.ELB wrote:How does this work? How does an ORR call their bluff? I'd be very interested to know this tactic. Might prove useful some day!Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Here goes another Open Records Request to the City. They're wrong and I'm starting to think ORR's are a way to call the bluff of cities pulling this stuff.
Chas.
elb
Chas.
- Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:16 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 371474
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
So, what is your question?texasparamedic wrote:This is long but I still need help
Here is my situation... Now to my point.. The front door has a complaint 30.06 on a clear glass door in white letters.