Return to “Conflicting laws in the penel code?”
Keith B wrote:WildBill, that must be from the New Testament in the NHV (New Hippie Version) bible.WildBill wrote:Groovy? I am not a bible scholar, but must have missed that part.recaffeination wrote:It's like how the Old Testament says thou shalt not eat bacon, but the New Testament says bacon is groovy so eat all you like.
Far out!Groovy? I am not a bible scholar, but must have missed that part.recaffeination wrote:It's like how the Old Testament says thou shalt not eat bacon, but the New Testament says bacon is groovy so eat all you like.buckaroo815 wrote:I am confussed about some laws and need help. I see this law that says
PC §9.06. CIVIL REMEDIES UNAFFECTED. The fact that conduct is justified under this chapter does not abolish or impair any remedy for the conduct that is available in a civil suit.
That reads to me you can be sued for using deadly force.
Then this code says
CPRC § 83.001. CIVIL IMMUNITY. A defendant who uses force or deadly force that is justified under Chapter 9, Penal Code, is immune from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from the defendant's use of force or deadly force, as applicable
And this reads to me you cant be sued.
Can someone explain this ?
