IMO, they are two separate crimes and PC §9.42(2)(A)-(B) does not apply to "Burglary of a Vehicle".Jumping Frog wrote:I've seen the discussions on this board on the topic of burglary versus burglary of vehicle. I personally conclude that burglary of vehicle is not an act covered under PC §9.42(2)(A)-(B) where "burglary" is referenced.A-R wrote:Stealing property out of someone's vehicle is not "theft" - it's burglary.
...
Question is whether "burglary of vehicle" is same as "burglary" for purposes of PC 9.42 justification. And seems the police believe it is.
The arguments advanced by srothstein were compelling, in my opinion. You are welcome to reach your own conclusion.
Once again, I hope the CHL's are not charged.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “CHL Holders fire on Suspects”
- Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:36 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3265
Re: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
- Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:00 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3265
Re: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
I believe that they will be charged.
- Sat Sep 01, 2012 7:58 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3265
Re: CHL Holders fire on Suspects
I think chumming is allowed for sharks, thieves and other predators.flb_78 wrote:Is it legal to bait thieves?