dogflight wrote:So by 'never required", you're saying that nothing statutorily compels a LEO to use force in the line of duty - 'cuz we could list scenarios all day long where the officer had better use force, and quick.jbarn wrote:LEO's and non LEO's have the same laws and they apply the same.
A LEO is never required to use force.
I teach that, in contrast to LEOs, nothing in the law requires a private citizen to use force, period. I guess I need to drop the contrast part.
