TexasCHLforum.com

WildBill wrote:

TexasTornado wrote:

WildBill wrote:

TexasTornado wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?
I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

This is an interesting question....if he goes back I suppose we'll get our answer. I sure wouldn't be willing to be the test case!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?

Yes.

locke_n_load wrote:I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

It would be, but not for anyone who received verbal notice.

Chas.

Is there a case study or penal code that states the notice is permanent? Might be the college student talking, but I need refferences to substantiate facts vs opinions.

IANAL, but here is one case where the original oral notice was given on June 2, 2001 and the arrest was made Sept 16, 2001. Upon appeal his conviction was affirmed.

http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/twelf ... /6374.html

Much appreciated!

TexasTornado wrote:

WildBill wrote:

TexasTornado wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?
I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

This is an interesting question....if he goes back I suppose we'll get our answer. I sure wouldn't be willing to be the test case!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?

Yes.

locke_n_load wrote:I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

It would be, but not for anyone who received verbal notice.

Chas.

Is there a case study or penal code that states the notice is permanent? Might be the college student talking, but I need refferences to substantiate facts vs opinions.

Based on my limited research time at the moment, Dallas Library as well as Austin city buildings require that the verbal notice include a duration. While this is policy not law, the fact that major cities implement this into their statement shows at the very least that it is a best policy if not a grey area within the criminal trespass legislation.

http://content.austin.ynn.com/ausconten ... lletin.pdf
https://www.dallascounty.org/department ... 092015.pdf

WildBill wrote:

TexasTornado wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?
I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

This is an interesting question....if he goes back I suppose we'll get our answer. I sure wouldn't be willing to be the test case!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?

Yes.

locke_n_load wrote:I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

It would be, but not for anyone who received verbal notice.

Chas.

Is there a case study or penal code that states the notice is permanent? Might be the college student talking, but I need refferences to substantiate facts vs opinions.

locke_n_load wrote:So is verbal notice effective forever?
I have a feeling that a business can remove a sign and then carry would be legal. What about verbal notice?

This is an interesting question....if he goes back I suppose we'll get our answer. I sure wouldn't be willing to be the test case!