ELB wrote:AG Paxton did not "let" Dallas Zoo do anything. The requirements for an "amusement park" were drawn very plainly, and he adhered closely to those in his opinion. This is problem for the legislature, not the AG.
AG Paxton also adhered closely to the law with respect to the courtroom and court offices, much to the consternation of a number of county commissioners and others.. This is a much more challenging determination, and I applaud him for it. It would have been very easy for him to go along with the notion that mult-use buildings are off limits entirely, but he stuck closely to the law -- as he did with "amusement parks."
Good on him.
