TexasCHLforum.com

Isn't it ironic the people who have more security and armed guards are telling the people who have none they should be defenseless. The mainstream media perverts language for their anti-human agenda. The argument is frequently presented as a "gun rights" issue. It's not, the guns have no rights. When someone can tell me about the rights a gun has, I'll tell them about the rights my pencil, car and stove have. Fundamentally the issue is a human rights issue, but if the media had a headline, "Government pushes bill restricting human right of self defense," the bill would never pass.

When Juianne Moore says, "It should not be a pro-gun-versus-anti-gun argument. It is not an argument about our Constitution," I even have trouble deciphering the word magic. So, it's not a pro-human versus anti-human argument, and it's not an argument about the document that outlines our human rights. Then she goes on to mention "common-sense gun-safety measures" which equates to "minimal infringements to your human rights." She follows up with another buzz word,"We need you to continue to turn the tide on 'gun violence'." The term "gun violence" and the accompanying statistics generally provided show the effectiveness of more restrictions to our civil liberties, always fail to show the "human violence" statistic which stays the same or increases in every case. As sad as it is, people will find a way to kill each other with knives, bats, fists, and feet if they don't have a firearm.

Texas was great while it lasted , but unfortunately today I'm having to call FEMA Region VI my home....