TexasCHLforum.com

rl14 wrote:I just got off the phone with DPS and they said I was approved and that they are now waiting to print it. No website change today and here is my timeline again.

12/18 application started
12/20 CHL-100 submitted
12/21 LTC docs received confirmation
12/28 Fingerprinted
2/18 Phone call to DPS no website change

GlassG19 wrote:

KC80 wrote:

GlassG19 wrote:

rl14 wrote:Here's my timeline
12/18 application started
12/20 CHL-100 submitted
12/21 LTC docs received confirmation
12/28 Fingerprinted
2/8 no website change

I know it's been only 49 days but I wont call till next week at the 60 day mark.
Side note: if I updated my drivers license address since submitting the application will that delay the card? I applied with the new address for LTC and after that changed the drivers license address. Thanks!

Just wondering how you get 49 days already? I was on the assumption that not 1 day is counted until your "final supporting doc's" were sent, & fingerprinting would be the final supporting doc's. So if that's the case, your final item needed would have been 12-28 or 12-29, depending on if they (RSD) actually received your fingerprint's the same day or next day 12-29...?.?.? Looking at many timelines here, that is correct,, most folks start the waiting once EVERYTHING is in, not application or CHL-100 day sent, "final item" or last item needed & fingerprint's is one of those items "needed". Correct me someone, if I'm wrong.
I hope I'am wrong. Otherwise if your waiting time starts AFTER only app & CHL-100 were sent I would be after 60 days without any notifications of sort nor request of any doc's missing,, nothing. I have spoken to them (he apologized taken so long) last Friday & again they said everything is in & that they would have a supervisor call me either yesterday or today with an update, & neither has happened as of this moment.

As I understand it, all documents as well as fingerprints have to be recieved to start processing. They can't start the background check without prints.

Thank you,, I thought so.