...and what with ammo prices these days...KD5NRH wrote:"Your honor, after I shot him the first time, he attempted to flee with my bullet..."srothstein wrote:You are correct that the suspect must be fleeing with property for the CHL to be legally able to shoot him.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Dallas officer shot a man in self defence”
- Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:52 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Dallas officer shot a man in self defence
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3181
Re: Dallas officer shot a man in self defence
- Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:44 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Dallas officer shot a man in self defence
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3181
Re: Dallas officer shot a man in self defence
Ace_Inthe_O wrote:Its ridiculous that the officer is even being questioned he acted in self defense after this man attacked him.
no it's not. it's called procedure. like they said, he's on routine leave, during the investigation. just like any civillian shooting goes to a grand jury. Homicide, is still a crime. you may be justified in committing it, but you have to prove it.
Deadly Force (as defined by the state) has nothing to do with wound, kill, or fuzzy bunnies.Ace in the O wrote: Do police even have the option of shooting to wound?
the officer shot the person who committing unlawful deadly force against him, to stop him. turns out, shooting the guy in the heart really stopped him.
how come civil rights people are almost always on the wrong side of things?? least now a days. what about Officer Villanueva's civil rights??? he has a right to go home to his ol' lady and kids, don't he??