As I set here killing lunch, at work, no gun, reading the back and forth about gun store workers....
It occurs to me the real answer to the question is how a pre-trail judge would interpret "under control". It is not worded "primary control", "total control", or any other phrase that specifies how much control a person would have to have. I suspect so long as the DA new a representative of the owner or an officer of a corporation would state the employee has control over any thing and consent the complaint would not fly.
But that would not stop a customer from saying "he put his hand on the gun and threatened me " That statement alone could get you in both Civil and Criminal trouble, and it would be real hard to defend, the old he said they said problem. So if I could, carry, I would conceal the carry.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Carrying a firearm at WORK for intimidation only?!”
- Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:13 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carrying a firearm at WORK for intimidation only?!
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4843
- Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:23 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Carrying a firearm at WORK for intimidation only?!
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4843