I'd settle for an example of someone who engaged in a good shoot while rip-roaring drunk, who was sued and lost.frankie_the_yankee wrote:Show me someone who was sued and lost, after doing a "good shoot", because at some time before the shooting they had had one drink. Note: Not just someone who was sued and lost. Someone who lost after a good shoot, (i.e. not after a questionable or bad shoot), because they had one drink.
Legal justification doesn't change with the sobriety of the shooter.