data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/423b9/423b914b429200c77849046ccab625ce7f3f3f89" alt="coolgleam :coolgleamA:"
And eliminating any duty to notify is just "common sense". Don't we all support "common sense" laws?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5627e/5627e958e8e7d87d2738092c74415280125fc58a" alt="Wink ;-)"
Return to “Why Hand Over CHL If You're Not Carrying?”
No law requires a driver to speak during a traffic stop. You've provided your identification; that's all that is required.flintknapper wrote:You sure?KBCraig wrote:A non-CHL doesn't even have to reply one way or the other.
A non-CHL doesn't even have to reply one way or the other.flintknapper wrote:Again, you are NOT required by law to display your CHL license when you are NOT carrying. If an officer asks if you are armed...you must give a reply, same as with any traffic stop.
Currently, under the "Motorist Protection Act" you are NOT required to volunteer that you are armed either. Of course, this is separate from CHL laws, but I wanted to point that out as well.
What our member LEOs think about this really isn't important. Don't get me wrong, I value their opinions and expertise, but they're all CHL-friendly.WildBill wrote:Abraham - As Keith stated there have been hundreds of posts on this subject. Unfortunately we haven't heard from very many LEOs to hear their preferences.