Just out of curiosity... would you think it "nonsense" if this was a bill which went the other way? Say, one that mandated banning guns in the workplace?mr fixit wrote:Those that spoke against it were (it seemed to me) lobbyist for business owner rights. They may have been in some association of businesses. Their basic argument was that it would infringe on a business owners rights to control his property.
I call nonsense, but that is the position they took.
If a property owner doesn't want guns on his property, that's not "nonsense". That's his right.
It's no different from your right to tell people they can't (fill in the blank) on your property.
Kevin