That would depend on the environment. If I was able to keep distance from the mob of attackers and there was no threat of hitting an innocent on the other side, things would likely be different. There is not enough information in that video to tell me what was to the left and right to make that determination.WTR wrote:What is your rationale for not intervenelng on the platform which is not confined?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “How Far Would You Go To Help?”
- Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:03 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: How Far Would You Go To Help?
- Replies: 73
- Views: 17292
Re: How Far Would You Go To Help?
- Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:01 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: How Far Would You Go To Help?
- Replies: 73
- Views: 17292
Re: How Far Would You Go To Help?
It also limits your ability to put distance between you and your target. 5-7 targets moving towards you from a close distance.jason812 wrote:That was my thoughts when I saw the video.Jago668 wrote:I view them being confined as a bonus. It limits their ability to move off the X once you start shooting. I would barely have to track targets, you could almost just blind fire in a straight line.
- Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:11 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: How Far Would You Go To Help?
- Replies: 73
- Views: 17292
Re: How Far Would You Go To Help?
There is a HUGE tactical difference between an LTC taking on 1 assailant vs taking on 5-7 assailants in a confined place such as a DART train.K.Mooneyham wrote:And I would like to think that most of the people who are members of this forum would certainly intervene in a situation where a grown man was violently assaulting a small child. WAY different circumstances than what occurred on the so-called Mugger Mover.The Annoyed Man wrote:I should have used more specific language. I was thinking "adult man, 5 year old girl".Soccerdad1995 wrote:It's also important to ensure that you fully understand the situation. In your "child molester" scenario, what happens when it turns out that the teenage girl is really a very young looking 19 year old who is role playing with her much older boyfriend? Personal morality aside, this is a (mostly) legal situation aside from public indecency, but hardly a case that justifies deadly force.The Annoyed Man wrote:Everything you say above is true, which is why I expressed some doubts of my own above. BTW, I've seen "unpleasantness" on a NYC subway car too, although I wasn't beaten senseless. But I did have to defend myself. Fortunately, it turned out OK other than some minor bumps and bruises. I was also jumped by a gang once while walking back to my apartment from the local grocery store. It happened on E 83rd St, between 2nd and 3rd Avenue....which was supposed to be a decent neighborhood. Again, I came out of it a little scuffed up but relatively unharmed. I also remember Bernhard Goetz, although by that time, I was back living in SoCal. I remember thinking at the time, "good for him.....too bad it happened in NYC though". But the reason I "challenged" you a little bit (for lack of a better word), was to say that surely you have your limits where you would intervene......for instance the hypothetical child molester I posed in my previous post. I don't think any of us are purists when it comes to our default position. There are always some exceptions where the moral imperative overrides the self-preservation imperative.rotor wrote:TAM, at age 74 carrying a .380 with 6 in the mag if I pulled my gun I would have to use it and reload with as many as were involved. Not a situation I want to be in. I know the court decision that says police don't have to protect. They didn't say I have to protect someone else. I think of the 3 guys in Oregon I believe that tried to protect 2 Muslim girls on a train and one was stabbed to death for his effort. The girls ran. I am not the type that would not help another person. I pulled a guy out of a truck after an accident that was covered in diesel and could have gotten both of us killed. This particular situation with so many kids would have been tough to handle by me unless they just stopped and ran. I am just not a young man like I used to be. On the other hand, I have gotten to be an old man because I am no longer young and stupid. I had an unruly gang of kids do this to me as a kid in the NYC subway system and nobody intervened so I know what it is like first hand. Now I believe that NYC has cops on every train. The other issue is that one of these kids might have had a gun too and I could have ended up in the morgue. No easy answer here. Easy to be brave on a forum, tougher to be honest.
There is a tendency by some (not you) to ask hypotheticals of "would be use deadly force in XYZ scenario". But whenever I envision these scenarios it always starts with verbal commands and/or questions like "Stop", "What are you doing?", "Are you OK?", and goes from there. In these types of cases, I would need to be prepared for the situation to escalate to deadly force but I have a hard time envisioning a shooting scenario in public that doesn't involve some type of escalation. At home in the middle of the night is a different story.