TexasCHLforum.com

powerboatr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 19, 2021 1:48 pm DA should be arrested after he pointed the rifle at the juror

at a minimum
and then he should sue biden, blm, cnn, etc


hopefully he goes home and stays out of sight and decompresses. get back to living a normal life.

RoyGBiv wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:13 pm Language warning.....
Certainly the murder charges should be a directed acquittal.
Done and done. Fat lady singing... at least on Murder.

rtschl wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 7:56 pm So I just finished watching testimony of his friend that bought the AR. On direct examination he stated he bought the rifle in his name with Kyle's money and would keep it until Kyle was 18. In his testimony it was revealed that he is being charged with two felonies by the Kenosha DA for providing firearm to someone under 18 in possession of a firearm. The DA i n his question didn't state what the exact two charges are. No mention of Federal charges against either of them.

So my question, does this constitute a straw purchase since he is intending to keep it until Kyle turns 18? Reading the FAQ at http://www.dontlie.org/faq.cfm I'm thinking it could because at the time of the purchase Kyle is a prohibited person. But with his intention of not giving it to him until he was not a prohibited person (i.e. 18), does that change it?

The main reason I am asking is I follow several 3 gun shooters on social media including some teens who are now adults, some who I have met at a NRA convention. Could their parents be charged with a straw purchase if their intent is to give them possession once they are no longer a minor?

philip964 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:47 am https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... ttenhouse/

Facebook removing posts supporting Kyle.

Considers it a mass shooting.