Search found 2 matches

by WarHawk-AVG
Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:47 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: prosecution over impromper 30.06 postings
Replies: 80
Views: 11089

frankie_the_yankee wrote:
Molon_labe wrote: Why should a CHL carrier be so scrutinized yet people slap up the GhostBusters no gun signs and immediately its DA LAW?
Ghostbuster and "No Guns" signs are not the law.

If you're on someone else's private property, you can expect to be scrutinized, and to have your behavior scrutinized, whether you're carrying a gun or not.
What I am saying is a hypothetical

You walk into a burgershack with a ghostbuster no gun on the door..ignoring it, yet you get outted by a massive anti-gunner manager that slapped that thing on the door and the police are called...who is more in the wrong..the manager who DOESN'T own the property or you for ignoring the false no guns sign??
by WarHawk-AVG
Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:34 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: prosecution over impromper 30.06 postings
Replies: 80
Views: 11089

K owner of the property might not have put the sign up..it could have been a ignorant "shift manager" that just slapped one up

Why should a CHL carrier be so scrutinized yet people slap up the GhostBusters no gun signs and immediately its DA LAW?

Return to “prosecution over impromper 30.06 postings”