It is not a law enforcement officer credential. It is simply a countrywide federal CCW for anyone that's been in the military for over ten years or retired that was an MP or equivalent.
I am not holding my breath that it will apply. But given the extremely rigorous background and qualifications to get this nationwide CCW it would seem to be at least a possibility.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Federal LEOSA versus the NICS System”
- Wed Sep 07, 2016 1:04 pm
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: Federal LEOSA versus the NICS System
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3707
- Wed Sep 07, 2016 1:00 pm
- Forum: The "Waiting Room"
- Topic: Federal LEOSA versus the NICS System
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3707
Federal LEOSA versus the NICS System
I submitted the below email to the ATF. Awaiting answer.
BATFE,
I have a question regarding the LEOSA and how it relates to the NICS system. Does it apply? Here is my explanation.
Scenario 1: individual has a valid Texas License to Carry and is therefore exempt from the NICS. That is very clear and your website supports this.
Scenario 2: Individual goes through and gets certified through the www.leosaonline.com webpage and gets Department of Defense country-wide CCW rights with the associated identification according to HR 218 LEOSA.
Since the individual has a valid country wide CCW permit rom the Department of Defense does the NICS have to be done??
Thanks,
David Lofton
BATFE,
I have a question regarding the LEOSA and how it relates to the NICS system. Does it apply? Here is my explanation.
Scenario 1: individual has a valid Texas License to Carry and is therefore exempt from the NICS. That is very clear and your website supports this.
Scenario 2: Individual goes through and gets certified through the www.leosaonline.com webpage and gets Department of Defense country-wide CCW rights with the associated identification according to HR 218 LEOSA.
Since the individual has a valid country wide CCW permit rom the Department of Defense does the NICS have to be done??
Thanks,
David Lofton