It already cost him mine. I will vote in 2020 but I won't vote for Trump no matter who else is on the ballot.bblhd672 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:33 amThis may cost Trump votes in 2020, not necessarily votes that go to his opponents but aren’t cast at all.Scott Farkus wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:39 pm Now, you've got "our guy", Trump, doing something administratively that even Obama didn't think he had the legal authority to do. It's going to set a horrible precedent if it stands.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking”
- Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:51 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
- Replies: 112
- Views: 64118
Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
- Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:05 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
- Replies: 112
- Views: 64118
Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
The enemies of the constitution were going to demonize them either way, so I'm not sure what they really gained, but hopefully it will be worth more than they lose in the long run.
- Sat Apr 07, 2018 5:02 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
- Replies: 112
- Views: 64118
Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
How is that different than the Akins Accelerator that OP mentioned? You know Bill Akins lost in court, right?Soccerdad1995 wrote:But by not adding a grandfather clause, the ATF's proposed rule is creating a separate and distinct violation of the U.S. Constitution through an uncompensated taking. Given the choice of violating a law (the Hughes amendment) or violating the Constitution, the Constitution should win. This all ignores the fact that the ATF isn't even a legislative body in the first place and has no business violating any laws at all.