TexasCHLforum.com

I think odds are Locke is more right than not - "Fines for Signs" is really more about making the government follow the law, not private entities that chose to not follow the law on government property.

Time and time again, Paxton has ruled that because it's the private party that is posting signs, the government isn't the actual posting party, so they don't have to remove signs that private party posted. Convoluted enough?

And Cedar Park actually runs the facility? Usually they'd contract that out.

We need another "Fines for Signs" for private parties, as well.

Would like to see updates when available. I had a brief email exchange with them, asking them who owned the property. They quickly told me the city, etc. But when I pointed out that they cannot enforce 30.06 postings, things got quiet.