TexasCHLforum.com

lawrnk

An appropriate comment on the national reviews website. Oh, and BOTH those guys were married, and one was cheating on a dying lady. Scum.

"When John Edwards's and Jesse Jackson's 'troubles' came to light, nobody asked about proper birth-control techniques. Those questions are reserved for the teenage daughters of female conservative candidates"

lawrnk

anygunanywhere wrote:
drw wrote:[trying to be unpopular here]

If the announcement of Bristol's out of wedlock pregnancy was intended to combat the allegations about Trig, why not just make a statement denying the allegations? I'm struck that they have not come out and just said that Trig is Sarah's baby, period. Why not just face your accusers and make a firm statement?

McCain chose Palin in order to appeal to socially conservative people. I was excited about her candidacy, and I gave her the benefit of the doubt regarding the Trig allegations. But to have a 17 year old daughter become pregnant out of wedlock is simply bad fruit, and nothing has been said to indicate that a mistake was made, or that what the young woman did was wrong.

Any excitement I had about Palin is gone, and I can't be the only prudish conservative out there with the same feeling. I wonder if McCain's goal of reaching out to conservatives has backfired here.

[/trying to be unpopular here]
Statements like yours are totally inappropriate.

Mrs. Anygun and I happen to be one of those out of wedlock parents. Our oldest was at our wedding and was jibbering about wanting his Mommy as we exchanged vows.

I am about as socially conservative as a person can be. People have errors in judgement but our first son was never thought of as a mistake and there was never a question that he would not be kept.

You can't hold a child's error in judgement like an out of wedlock pregnancy against the parents.

How many children have you raised? Keep trying to tell me how you would love and support them at a time of crisis in their lives. Based on your statements I can just imagine how it would be around your house.

Anygunanywhere

I will hold a candidate and spouse up to the candle flame, but their MINOR children are not fair game. Bristol IS a child. I do not expect perfection from anyones minor children. God know the grief I gave my parents (dad is a episcopalian pastor of 37 years) and he is about the most decent man I've known. I could tell you some stories about Biden's early 20's daughter that make Bristol look like a saint. But She is neither running for office, or as the "first lady/man"

lawrnk

John wrote:
drw wrote:
Mike from Texas wrote:Do you think the other candidate is the better choice? I sure hope not.
Of course not. Obama is a monster and would be a disaster for this country. McCain is clearer the lesser of the two evils. It's a shame that these are our choices, though.

You shouldn't be shamed by your choices.

Nah. Generally, I would agree with you. When I see Obama supporters, I see brain washed people intent on destroyng my country. I disagreed with Clinton, Kerry, and Gore politically. I see Obama as doomsday. Call it drama or hyperbole, but that's how I feel.

lawrnk

jimlongley wrote:And mathematically, the daughter could not have given birth to the baby in May and be five months pregnant now.

That is some really fuzzy math.

lawrnk

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/ ... 22&sp=true

Turns out her daughter is pregnant. I am glad she decided not to murder the child.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/ ... 22&sp=true

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 5 matches

Re: Does Palin have a dark secret?

Re: Does Palin have a dark secret?

Re: Does Palin have a dark secret?

Re: Does Palin have a dark secret?

Re: Does Palin have a dark secret?