TexasCHLforum.com

If there was an active shooter in their establishment immediately endangering lives, think HOB might allow or even request armed LEO rescue of their employees/customers or insist they go in unarmed?

Were HOB to insist unarmed LEO's go up against armed criminals, I wonder what the LEO's response might be?

Think HOB anti-gun stance might promptly change, especially if Dan A happened to be there with his life in immediate danger or think they'd hew to their anti-gun policy, Dan A. would just have to take his chances...?

Remember that cliche: A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged.

Taypo,

You're unrighteous indignation is silly.

If you care to act like the grownup I know you to be, and your questions equally adult, I'll be happy to answer.

Until then, adieu...

Taypo,

Really?

You're better than that.

nightmare69,

"this business will be changing its policy regarding off duty LE carry very soon."

I hope so.

As for folks getting huffy about LEO's getting to be armed when they, the non-LEO's/CHLers, don't get to be, tough! Maybe future legislation will change this, but in the meantime, are you sure you don't want armed LEO's, just because you aren't allowed to be armed everywhere they can be armed? That attitude, to me, is petty/childish.

Me, I want armed LEO's everywhere it's possible.

I'm on the deputy's side.

I want more armed LEO's where ever I go.