Search found 6 matches

by one eyed fatman
Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:33 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

Chuck Rosenthal has had it to easy for to long. Time to get someone in there that isn't spoiled rotten.
by one eyed fatman
Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:20 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

stevie_d_64 wrote:
one eyed fatman wrote:My CHL takes all the guesswork out of traveling laws.
+1, ditto, right-on...

But some day I might dissagree with you, and not really listen to what you say...

Is that ok??? Just thought I wold get that straightened out...

No offence intended... :lol:
Somebody here listens to me? I didn't know! :D
by one eyed fatman
Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:48 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

My CHL takes all the guesswork out of traveling laws.
by one eyed fatman
Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:46 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

jimlongley

Corporate America, lawyers and politicians know one thing. As long as they can keep the people confused, disoriented and in the dark they have a job. That's what it's all about for them.

Here's a few examples. As long as Microsoft keeps their operating system screwed up they are needed and keep making money. As long as lawyers (or anybody else) write laws that are confusing they have a job. As long as contract engineers keep drawing parts that they know don't fit military trucks they have a job.

The only difference between them and your average 7-11 robber is that they are educated.
by one eyed fatman
Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:23 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

Less than 50% of the Texas House and Texas Senate are attorneys.
Must of been how the loophole was invented.
by one eyed fatman
Sat Aug 27, 2005 9:51 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: New Traveling Law
Replies: 88
Views: 17832

EricS76 wrote:It seems to me that some people want to make this new law complicated, or form it somehow to fit their needs. When you strip it all down, it's very simple.

We should all be able to agree that the law revolves around traveling. Ask yourself "am I traveling when I go to the grocery store 10 blocks from my house?" No, I'm not traveling. "Am I traveling when I take my kids to football practice?" No, I'm not traveling. We all know when we're traveling and when we are not. Some people wish to stretch the law to cover more things, and yes, it may be possible to get away with it. But you know when you're traveling and when you are not. If you feel the need to carry a handgun in your vehicle all the time, you'd be much better advised to get a CHL and stop argueing this law or trying to stretch it to suit your needs.
It seems to me that some people want to make this new law complicated, or form it somehow to fit their needs.
Now your getting it. Lawyers make the laws and they do what they need to do to make money from these laws. It's no fun making a law everyone can understand. :roll:

Return to “New Traveling Law”