Search found 2 matches

by Dragonfighter
Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:43 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Shall not be infringed
Replies: 19
Views: 2187

Re: Shall not be infringed

newTexan wrote:
Dragonfighter wrote: Except for that pesky comma.
Since when do the rules of English, logic, data, reason, or historical intent matter in the debate over "reasonable gun control"?

THINK OF THE CHILDREN! Didn't you see those sage kids standing behind His Holiness on the platform as he signed sweeping reforms with his mighty pen? How can anything compare to that? I'm surprised we haven't all lined up to turn in our death machines...

Sorry, had a crappy day and my sarcasm meter is set to "11".
Dang it, forgot the children. :oops:
by Dragonfighter
Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:55 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Shall not be infringed
Replies: 19
Views: 2187

Re: Shall not be infringed

canvasbck wrote:Since Sandy Hook, I have been doing alot of research on the history and background of the second amendment and how it came into being. Unfortunately, I did not do this before because I took the amendment as written and assumed that no further research was needed.

Due to my previously ignorant state, I could not accurately articulate what was meant by the framers when they said "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state". Antis will argue that the 2A only applies to a militia. Turns out that's right, <SNIP>
Except for that pesky comma.

Return to “Shall not be infringed”