TexasCHLforum.com

rb4browns wrote:How many fellow CHLers wink at knowlingly disregarding legal 30.06 signs yet rail against illegal immigrants simply because they, "broke the law" to get to America.

I don't know. How many?
Is that more or less than the number of companies with anti-gun signs that hire illegals?

rb4browns wrote:Carrying a gun and *feeling* like a cop does not equal being a cop.

As far as I can tell, you're the only one here getting those confused.

I also notice that you didn't answer my implicit question regarding morality (which is different than legality.)

GrillKing wrote:Doesn't apply to a peace officer, from PC30.05:

That's what I said. A non-compliant sign has the same meaning for me as it does for a Texas Peace Officer.

Some people are saying it's morally wrong for an armed CHL to enter a building with a gunbuster sign. I'm asking if they apply the same standards to armed Peace Officers.

A gunbuster sign has the same meaning for me as it does for a Texas Peace Officer.

Does a Texas Peace Officer violate the rights of a business owner if, while armed, he walks past a gunbuster sticker on a restaurant door to eat lunch?

I prefer to patronize companies that want my business but sometimes expediency or social obligations take precedence. At those times, I give the same respect to a non-compliant sign that I imagine a Texas Peace Officer would give the sign. After all, a simple "ghostbuster" sticker has the same meaning for both of us.