My logic exactly. I also use this when asked if I want an extended warenty on a product.tbrown wrote:You have it backwards. If some place is known to be SO DANGEROUS THEY NEED ARMED SECURITY then it is absolutely immoral to deny someone with a CHL the ability to carry there. Whether they disarm victims through company policy or law, they are collaborators with the VCA they empower.drjoker wrote:Some people work at a place where guns are banned by law and/or 30.06 posted. If the workplace provides armed security guards or off duty police officers then it's fine. Otherwise it woudl be immoral to ban guns at work.
They spend the sales kpitch telling me how good it is. At purchase they remind me how expensive it can be to repair.