The reality probably is that the number is far less than 3%. I would guess that a large percentage of CHL holders are not as active / proactive in support of their 2nd amendment protected rights as those on this board. Most probably don't carry very often and aren't as concerned on a day to day basis as to where they can and cannot carry. A business would likely alienate a much smaller number than 3%. I have nothing to back this up, only a hunch.
However, I think basing a strategy on the economics of CHL holders is not a strong strategy.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Soccer mom loses PA permit”
- Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:20 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Soccer mom loses PA permit
- Replies: 47
- Views: 5231
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:42 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Soccer mom loses PA permit
- Replies: 47
- Views: 5231
Re: Soccer mom loses PA permit
I Agree!!!Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now we have 12 years of experience with CHL and an excellent track record. Those facts are on our side. However, if we start carrying handguns openly, we've lost the out-of-sight-out-of-mind effect and people who never give CHL a second thought are going to react to what they perceive as an "in your face" situation. This is not theoretical, it's not at all analogous with the "blood in the streets" arguments CHL opponents used against us. It's based upon recent experience in Texas. What is uncertain is how widespread, how strong, and how committed the opposition will be. This is why I acknowledge that my fears may ultimately be unfounded. It's also why open-carry supporters should be equally honest and admit that there is a risk. You can no more guarantee that businesses will not react by posting 30.06 signs than I can guarantee they will. In my view, based upon past experience in Texas, the risk is simply too high.
Chas.