Good point. Shucks!CleverNickname wrote:Unless it was a .410 barrel (i.e. under 1/2" bore) they would probably say it's a destructive device.apostate wrote:Franklin Armory's new Reformation makes me wonder if a straight grooved barrel could be likewise assembled on a virgin 590 receiver to make a 14" barreled non-shotgun with a full stock.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Mossberg Shockwave”
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:28 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Mossberg Shockwave
- Replies: 210
- Views: 69020
Re: Mossberg Shockwave
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:13 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Mossberg Shockwave
- Replies: 210
- Views: 69020
Re: Mossberg Shockwave
Franklin Armory's new Reformation makes me wonder if a straight grooved barrel could be likewise assembled on a virgin 590 receiver to make a 14" barreled non-shotgun with a full stock.
- Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:14 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Mossberg Shockwave
- Replies: 210
- Views: 69020
Re: Mossberg Shockwave
You may want to read what the ATF wrote about carrying one concealed.
http://www.mossberg.com/wp-content/uplo ... 3-2-17.pdf
http://www.mossberg.com/wp-content/uplo ... 3-2-17.pdf
- Sat May 06, 2017 7:16 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Mossberg Shockwave
- Replies: 210
- Views: 69020
Re: Mossberg Shockwave
The term they used is "legal shotguns" and by your own argument the Mossberg Shockwave is not one. It may however be an illegal shotgun.austinmc62 wrote:And that is the point. This is the closest ruling to what a shotgun is by a state agency. And the particular point is shoulder fired, which the schockwave cannot be.
