Search found 5 matches

by ScottDLS
Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:58 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Confusion with too many rules
Replies: 48
Views: 9446

Re: Confusion with too many rules

MeMelYup wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
o b juan wrote:"You can carry in a church now." Jagos post

From 95' You could always carry i if you were not given Effective Consent " or notice :rules:

In the following locations
Church, Hospital, Nursing Home, Amusment park, Citycouncil, school board meeting
No you couldn't carry there with a CHL until 1997. :rules:
Carry at Church, Hospital, Nursing Home, Amusment park, Citycouncil, school board meeting was with written consent, same as with colleges.
I left my 1995 CHL-16 book at home and I'm traveling, but I don't think there was an exception to 46.035 for having consent in 1995-96. I'll dig it up later and post, but "effective consent" is a concept in the 30.06 language, and 30.06 didn't exist in 1995-1996. Where in 46.035 did it say you can could carry in Church, Amusement Park, Hospital, Nursing home with effective consent. I don't think it did.
by ScottDLS
Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:34 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Confusion with too many rules
Replies: 48
Views: 9446

Re: Confusion with too many rules

o b juan wrote:"You can carry in a church now." Jagos post

From 95' You could always carry i if you were not given Effective Consent " or notice :rules:

In the following locations
Church, Hospital, Nursing Home, Amusment park, Citycouncil, school board meeting
No you couldn't carry there with a CHL until 1997. :rules:
by ScottDLS
Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:17 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Confusion with too many rules
Replies: 48
Views: 9446

Re: Confusion with too many rules

Rowyco1 wrote:Here is one that confuses me. Went to AA Center today. Expected to see a 30.06 and 30.07 sign. Instead just saw the 30.07 sign for no open carry? Did they change the rules on CC at the AAC?
I would consider that a victory since they've banned CC by policy even for non-prohibited events. Are they still preventing people from CCing there with wands? I know they are at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, because I just filed a complaint with the City Attorney.

Finally, AAC can not use 30.06/7 to prosecute you for carrying there because they are owned by the City of Dallas and therefore 30.06/7 does not apply. On the other hand, they will likely just keep doing what they've been doing by physically keeping you out.
by ScottDLS
Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:25 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Confusion with too many rules
Replies: 48
Views: 9446

Re: Confusion with too many rules

And sorry to OP for confusing the issue further. Joel's summary was very good...I just like to see myself type... :biggrinjester:
by ScottDLS
Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:17 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Confusion with too many rules
Replies: 48
Views: 9446

Re: Confusion with too many rules

joelamosobadiah wrote:Ultra simplistic....

Locations that are prohibited by signage
30.06 (concealed), 30.07 (open), TABC 50%

Locations that are statutorily off limits
Educational institutions
Courts and Offices utilized by the courts
Professional sporting events
Correctional facility
Polling places
Racetrack
Secured area of an airport

Note TABC 51% locations are off limits regardless of proper signage being posted.
Note you have a statutory DEFENSE TO PROSECUTION if 51% sign is not posted. Just like you have a DEFENSE for carrying a handgun if you have a LTC... :evil2:

Return to “Confusion with too many rules”