Search found 4 matches
Return to “The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard”
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:26 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
- Replies: 62
- Views: 11590
Re: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
Rich - According the article I linked from FM Leader, they changed the ordinance in 2010 so that the answer seems to be no...you have to have a fence or leash...
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:29 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
- Replies: 62
- Views: 11590
Re: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
What about Rich's private property rights!!!??? These are inviolate in Texas. Better put up that 30.05 circle-slash-net sign.... Darn if these open net carrying yahoo's didn't have to mess it up for those of us that don't want to show off our dogs by parading them around our own property....
What if your dog is "printing" under a blanket in your front yard? Is that publicly displaying a dog in a manner calculated to alarm?
What if you are "brandishing" a leash!!!?
What if your dog is "printing" under a blanket in your front yard? Is that publicly displaying a dog in a manner calculated to alarm?
What if you are "brandishing" a leash!!!?
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:24 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
- Replies: 62
- Views: 11590
Re: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
Should have a circle-slash-dog catcher sign on the yard, then it'd be a class B for him to walk on your lawn while "being a dog catcher"....The Wall wrote:Did the dog catcher have a warrant? What was she doing on your property? If it's a city ordnance then you better work on getting the law changed and vote for council members that work for the people and not their own agendas.
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:06 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
- Replies: 62
- Views: 11590
Re: The dog catcher "caught" my dogs in my front yard
Flower Mound by any chance, Rich?
http://starlocalmedia.com/theleader/new ... 720b3.html
http://starlocalmedia.com/theleader/new ... 720b3.html
...The amendment also added to its existing leash law. It now states: “It is unlawful for any owner to allow an animal to chase vehicles or molest, attack or interfere with other animals or people on public property, be at large or fail to keep an animal under restraint in a securely enclosed or confined area and in a manner that will isolate the animal from the public.”
The amendment also changed the definition of “at large” and “under restraint” to make the requirements more strict.
Dogs must now be on a leash or behind a fence while on or off property. Previously, a dog could be off leash if under effective control, such as voice command.
These changes come in light of an increasing amount of incidents reported of animals at large acting aggressive toward residents and other animals....