Search found 6 matches

by ScottDLS
Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:34 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

WildRose wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:33 pm
ScottDLS wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:21 pm Maybe if they rule for carry I’ll open carry a blue rubber fake handgun in during teen court. We’ll then see if the DPS comes all the way to Flower Mound and throws a flash bang in my window at 2 am. :shock:
Such provocation do nothing but make all of us look bad.
As would the DPS and SWAT team throwing a flashbang grenade in my window while serving a warrant for something that is not a crime. :evil2:
Take the flashbang part out and the above has already happened to someone in Bexar County.
by ScottDLS
Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:33 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

WildRose wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:33 pm
ScottDLS wrote: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:21 pm Maybe if they rule for carry I’ll open carry a blue rubber fake handgun in during teen court. We’ll then see if the DPS comes all the way to Flower Mound and throws a flash bang in my window at 2 am. :shock:
Such provocation do nothing but make all of us look bad.
As would the DPS and SWAT team throwing a flashbang grenade in my window while serving a warrant for something that is not a crime. :evil2:
by ScottDLS
Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:21 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

Maybe if they rule for carry I’ll open carry a blue rubber fake handgun in during teen court. We’ll then see if the DPS comes all the way to Flower Mound and throws a flash bang in my window at 2 am. :shock:
by ScottDLS
Wed May 04, 2016 8:49 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

Scott in Houston wrote:
ELB wrote:
Scott in Houston wrote:Very disappointed in the Elgin ISD ruling.
That could create the slippery slope for others wanting to claim exclusion based on being an educational institution or school district.
I find your comment a bit baffling, since I see little doubt that forbidding concealed (and now, open) carry on elementary, junior, and high school districts (without permission of the district) was exactly what the legislature intended. I don't like it, but an independent school district is precisely what the law meant. There is no slope at this point, for the AG to say otherwise would have been in direct contravention of the law. I'm even puzzled that someone went to the trouble to even make a complaint about a ISD administration building.
Read his letter. These comments, "(opining that FERPA applies to student records at both the state and local level because "educational agency or institution" includes any public or private agency or institution that receives federal funding under an applicable education program, without regard to whether it enrolls students") "

So any agency that gets federal funding from an education program can now be considered a school? So what if a zoo gets money? Or libraries, or … ? See the slope I'm talking about?

I believe the intent of the was SCHOOLS… not all buildings supporting them like bus barns or administrative offices completely separate from a school.
I don't think the opinion goes that far. When the letter refers to "applicable education program" that could mean "applicable to SCHOOLS". Like Head Start for Pre-K SCHOOLS, not daycares (which wouldn't qualify).

What I read from the opinion is that the ISD administration buildings are part of the SCHOOL system and supporting it, therefore covered. I don't agree with it, but I can see the reasoning. The Fort Worth Zoo might be off limits if it was OWNED by FWISD AND used as part of the curriculum, but just because they "educate" people there and sometimes have school activities, doesn't make them a SCHOOL. I predict they lose.
by ScottDLS
Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:15 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

Where's everyone that was calling for AG Paxton's head merely days ago? How about everyone that said that his indictment makes him unfit to serve.... 'cause he did some bad stuff or whatever?

Also, just because the state courts let Perry get away with "abuse of office" for vetoing a budget... Who does he think he think he was, the Governor or something? Anyway, that doesn't mean we don't need an AG that will unilaterally declare Constitutional Carry NOW. Get rid of Paxton and put him in jail for declaring the Dallas Zoo an Amusement Park. Why do we keep electing people that read the law as it was written instead of what it was supposed to mean? :rules:
by ScottDLS
Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:00 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88589

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

Quick we need to get rid of this guy. :mad5 5 months is too long and he let the Dallas Zoo be a an amusement park. And the Democrats say he is the latest Bernie Madoff hence his indictment in Collin County. We need to elect a non-lawyer as AG.

Return to “30.06 Ruling Letters”