It would seem to be stronger, but it has been ruled to mean exactly the same as a Defense. "It is an exception to the application of..." is the language in the text of the PC section on standard of proof.
Search found 7 matches
Return to “30.06/30.07 question”
- Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:59 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
- Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:25 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
There is a thread somewhere out there where Charles mentioned the actual court case that established that 46.15 only created a Defense to Prosecution because it didn't use the exact language in TXPC 2.02. I think it was in Harris County and there was apparently some back room discussions that led to it... Anyway, IMO a Defense is pretty powerful if you clearly meet the criteria. Even Texas LEOs now rely on this to be able to carry.
- Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:55 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
And the courts have ruled that that language constitutes only a Defense to prosecution. According to the decision language that must be used to create an exception is: It is an exception to the application of ...jordanmills wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:03 pmThat's not correct. The wording used is "does not apply to". The word "defense" does not appear in 46.15.ScottDLS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:16 amTechnically if they do not post, you have a defense to prosecution. In my view that means it's not illegal. That is unless you consider carrying anywhere WITH LTC illegal, since 46.15 is ruled only a Defense to 46.02.Pawpaw wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:44 am If it's a 51% location, it doesn't matter whether they post the sign or not.
According to PC §46.035:
So even without a sign, carrying in a 51% location is illegal.(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed or carried in a shoulder or belt holster, on or about the license holder’s person:
(1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;
From TXPC Chapter 2 Burden of Proof
Since 46.15 does not include this exact language, an appeals court ruled it was a Defense.Sec. 2.02. EXCEPTION. (a) An exception to an offense in this code is so labeled by the phrase: "It is an exception to the application of . . . ."
(b) The prosecuting attorney must negate the existence of an exception in the accusation charging commission of the offense and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant or defendant's conduct does not fall within the exception.
(c) This section does not affect exceptions applicable to offenses enacted prior to the effective date of this code.
- Sat Dec 15, 2018 12:28 am
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
Having an LTC is also only a defense to prosecution to 46.02. So if something is “illegal” when you have a valid defense, then everyone carrying under one of the 46.15 provisions, including LEO are breaking the law, or doing something “illegal”.C-dub wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 7:32 pmWe agree on this.
I Disagree. This is what Pawpaw was saying. It is still illegal and I mentioned that the lack of a sign or properly posted sign is only a defense to prosecution.
If I'm still misunderstanding your position I apologize. My allergies are bugging me tonight and they are becoming quite irritating.
- Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:51 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
No I'm saying that it is NOT illegal to carry in a 51% location if they are not properly posted. It is correct that if a non-51% location is (wrongly) posted 51%, you may carry. I was saying Paw-Paw was mistaken.C-dub wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:58 pmWhat? Re-read what oohrah said again please. Although oddly phrased I think what he is saying is correct.ScottDLS wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:23 pmTechnically not true. See my earlier post.oohrah wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:56 amTrue, and oddly, if an invalid 51% is posted, it's not illegal to carry past it (but I wouldn't want to have that discussion).Pawpaw wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:44 am If it's a 51% location, it doesn't matter whether they post the sign or not.
According to PC §46.035:
So even without a sign, carrying in a 51% location is illegal.(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed or carried in a shoulder or belt holster, on or about the license holder’s person:
(1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;
If a non-51% business puts up the 51% sign that doesn't make it illegal to carry past it, right? Or are you saying it is illegal even though the business does not meet the 51% requirements?
- Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:23 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
Technically not true. See my earlier post.oohrah wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:56 amTrue, and oddly, if an invalid 51% is posted, it's not illegal to carry past it (but I wouldn't want to have that discussion).Pawpaw wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:44 am If it's a 51% location, it doesn't matter whether they post the sign or not.
According to PC §46.035:
So even without a sign, carrying in a 51% location is illegal.(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed or carried in a shoulder or belt holster, on or about the license holder’s person:
(1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;
- Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:16 am
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: 30.06/30.07 question
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7149
Re: 30.06/30.07 question
Technically if they do not post, you have a defense to prosecution. In my view that means it's not illegal. That is unless you consider carrying anywhere WITH LTC illegal, since 46.15 is ruled only a Defense to 46.02.Pawpaw wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:44 am If it's a 51% location, it doesn't matter whether they post the sign or not.
According to PC §46.035:
So even without a sign, carrying in a 51% location is illegal.(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed or carried in a shoulder or belt holster, on or about the license holder’s person:
(1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;