TexasCHLforum.com

Morgan wrote:Shooting a suicide bomber isn't "shooting a person who's trying to commit suicide to save their life" tho. And suicide bombing isn't about suicide, it's about bombing. If they could pull it off without dieing, they would.

fickman wrote:Nothing funny, but I do wonder why, without fail, if you get a group of adults together in a room for a class, at least three individual personalities will be present (sometimes all of them in one guy).

2) The combative non-lawyer lawyer
He argues every point, tries to shoot holes in every statement, and often his own anecdote to every topic raised. He guarantees you won't get out early. He's not asking questions out of an honest desire to know something important. . . he's asking them to demonstrate his own "vast" knowledge or to catch the instructor off guard.

3) The endless "what-if" scenario guy
Anytime the instructor makes a point or paints a picture, this guy comes up with an endless number of modifications or unrealistic additions to the scenario. He can't accept the threat assessment strategy at face value, he has to try to explore every single potential situation that could ever arise at the expense of the sanity of the class and the patience of the instructors.