I can’t really tell if BDickens agrees with me or not. Oh well as Mark Twain once wrote, “"..above all, I was afraid of a united church. For it makes a mighty power, the mightiest conceivable. And when it by and by gets into selfish hands, as it's bound to, it means death to human liberty and paralysis to human thought.” Mr. Clemens was commenting mainly on the Crusades when he wrote this but even today, we as Christians are to strive all our lives to understand His word. But also as Christians, we will not agree on what exactly that Word means and that is why there are so many different Christian religions. This country was founded on that very principle.Liberty wrote:bdickens wrote:Allow me to demonstrate an example of why proof-texting is frowned upon by serious biblical scholars:
The Second Amendment community frequently likes to cite, as our dear friend TDDude has done, Luke 22:35 as "proof" that arming oneself is not only condoned, but approved of by Christ. But the whole passage reads : "35 He said to them, ‘When I sent you out without a purse, bag, or sandals, did you lack anything?’ They said, ‘No, not a thing.’ 36He said to them, ‘But now, the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one. 37For I tell you, this scripture must be fulfilled in me, “And he was counted among the lawless”; and indeed what is written about me is being fulfilled.’ 38They said, ‘Lord, look, here are two swords.’ He replied, ‘It is enough." [emphasis mine]
Clearly the implication in this one passage is that, at least in the popular mind of the time, going about armed is something that "the lawless" do and not ordinary citizens.
Now, I do believe that God is okay not only with be being armed but being armed at church as well. But I can't legitimately use Luke 22:25 to support that belief; I have to turn elsewhere.
I’ve delved into the Bible before on this forum and have been booted out for violating the rules so I was attempting to keep things brief.
Yes, Jesus was to be counted among the lawless but I still see Luke 22:35 as being a warning to the disciples that they were going to be hunted and persecuted and that it serves no purpose that they let themselves be killed needlessly. Some select few were called to be martyrs but not all. It can be argued that God will protect whom He wants to protect and we may call this a miracle. The Bible is full of miracles but the receiver of that miracle always had to DO something in order to receive the miracle. None of God’s miracles were simply handed out. Satan is the one who hands out “freebies”. Of course, satan’s freebies end up costing much more in the end.
In the Bible, the cripple had to get up and carry his mat out of the room, the blind man had to walk clear across town, he’s still blind remember, with mud on his eyes and wash in a particular river in order to be able to see. We have to make the effort to arm ourselves be willing to do what it takes to face the “dragon” in whatever forms it takes. Then, I believe that God will give us what we need.
Once I accepted Christ, I don’t have to DO anything else to receive God’s grace, but I believe I do have to DO something to receive His protection and blessings. Including wearing a seat belt, locking my doors at night, and arming myself.
Here is a link to a long list of Bible passages for those who want to read more.
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... ilit=bible