Ahh, I didn't realize that- I thought it had to be signed. Thanks for clarifying for me.Flightmare wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 8:05 pm Keep in mind, an interruption would only prevent a veto. Not signing it by the 20th is effectively the same as signing it.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “HB 1927 on the Senate floor now”
- Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:27 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
- Replies: 387
- Views: 119499
Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
- Fri Jun 11, 2021 7:51 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
- Replies: 387
- Views: 119499
Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
I keep thinking of all the times in my life I put something off for just the right time.... and how many times something came up and interrupted my plans. Fingers crossed!
They've had a lot of time to get together for an hour and some cameras.
They've had a lot of time to get together for an hour and some cameras.
- Wed May 26, 2021 3:16 pm
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
- Replies: 387
- Views: 119499
Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
I seem to have misplaced my sympathy.Ruark wrote: ↑Wed May 26, 2021 3:07 pm Apparently, the only way a business can preclude ALL carrying is to post ALL THREE signs: 05, 06 and 07. Given the size of these signs, that's going to mean a whole WALL of signage at many entrances, which will be very unpopular. Many places, e.g. hospitals, have big, elaborate 06/07 signs mounted in glass frames and bolted onto stone walls, with no room for anything else.
That's the price they will have to pay for excluding law abiding citizens from carrying... I mean they could have no signage and keep the entrances pretty and not incur any more risk than they already do by only letting the bad guys carry.
- Fri May 07, 2021 10:55 am
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
- Replies: 387
- Views: 119499
Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
We don't take general law classes to be free in society, but are expected to know that assault, theft, murder and a whole host of other things are illegal. I don't see the difference?There was lots of discussion about personal responsibility to learn the law since the everyone would not be taking the mandated LTC course.