Search found 1 match

by HankB
Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:52 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Glockmeisters and Glockheads...Question?
Replies: 15
Views: 1763

Re: Glockmeisters and Glockheads...Question?

Mac Truck wrote:I'm a huge Glock fan. Its what I carry, and have yet to have one solitary malfunction after over 4000 rounds in my 26 and about twice that in my 17. That being said, I have come across a baffling question.

First of all, I'm a Private Investigator by trade, and specialize in very difficult Repossessions. A lot of my day is spent in the Wards and inner city, so I'm pretty well armed, G17 on my hip and G26 on my ankle, with two spare mags on my belt. I carry Black Talons in them both. Those haven't been made for a LONG time - I'd swap out the Black Talons for fresher ammo. I started thinking about it the other day, and Heaven forbid that I actually am forced to pull and shoot someone, but if I do, its most likely going to be in a very urban environment. I've been very concerned that the velocity of the bullet in a 9mm is too great to be in such a crowded environment, The higher velocity helps ensure expansion. I don't see the "high" velocity of a 9mm JHP is any problem in an urban environment. so I've already dedicated to swapping out for .45's. My question is, why in living heck doesn't Glock make a COMPACT .45?? They make a service model, a subcompact, and a single stack subcompact, which is a lot of boom for a little gun. The Compact would be perfect, but they simply don't have one. WHY????

Secondly, Beretta, Springfield, M&P, and everyone else are now producing their polymer lines with adjustable backstraps. Every woman that has come into the shop to test guns feels the Glock, but ultimately opts for something with narrower grips. Is Glock just stubborn, or what???

We also get guys in here that won't buy a Glock because it's Hot and meant to be carried that way, with no external safety. I've heard rumors that the new generation pistols are going to have an external safety. Anyone confirm this or am I making stuff up again? A manual safety on a Glock makes about as much sense as the lock on the side of an S&W revolver - no useful purpose whatsoever, and it adds an additonal failure mode.

Return to “Glockmeisters and Glockheads...Question?”