TexasCHLforum.com

ok, thanks for clarifying that.

>I didn't know that once I have the card I won't need to provide the 3 months proof of residency

I missed that part - when did this rule change?

In another roundabout way, the memo from ATF on firearms purchases for non-resident aliens used a CHL holder as an example of 'insufficient' eligibility to allow the purchase. ie. a non-resident alien with a valid state hunting license was fine, but a CHL was not. see? no logic.

:-)

>So, if the 90-day thing (actually, isn't it 180 days?) is no longer a valid CHL requirement, aren't you, in a round-a-bout
> way, still required to have a residency minimum, because you have to meet condition (9)?

logically, that is probably correct. However, I'm not sure logic applies to federal laws (any maybe this is an ATF rule rather than a law ?). The bottom line is, if a non-citizen purchases a firearm from an FFL, I'm pretty sure they'll be required to show proof of 90 days "continuous" residence in the state independent of the TX DL and CHL.

>No longer need to be a TX resident for >90 days

That is true for a CHL, but it still applies for firearms purchases through an FFL.