If you will read a few paragraphs down from the above mentioned eligability requirements you will see some language that goes something like this: (can you tell I'm not a lawyer? Also I have no real computer, just this "smart phone" - and I'm not as smart as the phone or I would cut and paste it for you, but as it is my thumbs are too fat for this tiny keyboard...)
OK, back to the point.
The paragraph below all that says something like:
"notwithstanding blah blah blah, a person is not considered ineligable if they furnish the department with a certificate from a Doctor whose primary practice is in the field of phycology that the persons condition is in remission and not likely to return..."
The department will furnish documents pertaining to this on request...blah blah blah.
Again I'm not a lawyer or expert but - we do have several on this forum.
Our illustrious administrator Mr. Charles Cotton for instance.
IMHO, it's not fair that a person who faced and overcame an "addicition or problem" should be punished as a result. So in summary, you get a letter from a "shrink" that says your all better now, submit it, and you might be good to go. Good Luck.
Man thats a lot to type!
IMO, just to stay safe it would be a good idea to consult an attorney first.
Because after all, I'm just some guy with a phone and fat thumbs.
