Search found 3 matches
Return to “GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming”
- Mon Aug 14, 2023 6:05 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7097
Re: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
Hooray for cash and/or cryptocurrency.
- Sun Aug 13, 2023 10:04 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7097
Re: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
Time for him to go. He’s forgotten that he serves the people of Texas, and not the entire U.S.mayor wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:58 amI received a canned response from Mr. Cornyn about how much he is concerned about gun violence and the 2A, thanking me for my input.Grayling813 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:04 am Thank TX Sen Cornyn for teaming with Demoncrats to infringe.
What a squish.
Well lately, yeah. They’ve shown strong testicular fortitude in several good rulings in the past year. An abundance of such fortitude requires special pants to accommodate it.
Yeah, I always found the manner, time, and place of Justice Scalias's death a title too convenient for the opposition. Maybe we ought to put a phone tap on Hillary's Carpet Cleaners?
- Thu Aug 10, 2023 11:44 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7097
Re: GOA Warns Executive Action for Universal Background Checks Coming
And it’s worth noting that the 5th Circuit justices are members of the Special Pants club, and they’ve done very well on our behalves lately. I’d trust them to handle it appropriately. If the commies want to have their way, they’re ultimately going to have to either repeal the 2A (and start CW2), or legislate the issues in such a way that SCOTUS doesn’t have to beat them down in court. Not even congress can pass an unconstitutional law and avoid it going eventually to SCOTUS.srothstein wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 9:27 pmThere is a very big chance of this. The ruling was only to reinstate the stay on the original TRO while the case actually went through appeals. That means the Fifth Circuit will have to hear the actual case now, then that ruling may get appealed to SCOTUS. Four of the justices wanted to let the TRO stay in effect, which means they already think the rule is unconstitutional. The 3 liberal justices will probably say the rule is good, leaving two who we have to guess if it was willingness to let the case go through the process or they think the rule is good. I think the odds are good that at least one of the two was just wanting to get to rule on the actual case more quickly.
I know it will take some patience for these things to work out, but absent a social collapse, they WILL work out. That’s not what everyone wants to hear, but it’s a fact. By the time all these cases make their way to SCOTUS and are decided, 5 more years may have passed.