TexasCHLforum.com

seamusTX wrote:

redlin67 wrote:Sorry, it does sound kind of weird, but terminate is the term we have to use at my employment.

The "kinder gentler" word is separate.

- Jim

That's good, because we don't want to see ex-spouses terminating one another.

Interestingly, when you look at Texas' score, we score a 9 (http://www.bradycampaign.org/stategunlaws/scorecard/TX/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;), meaning there are at least a few things we do that they agree with. That begs the question: If the Brady Bunch is the standard by which we judge gun grabbers, then shouldn't a perfect record on the RKBA earn you a 0; or, is it a case that even a broken clock is right once every 12 hours?

According to the Brady Campaign, we earned those 9 points for:
A) Restricting access to handguns for children under the ages of 16/17 - 5 out of 5 possible points;
B) Employers not forced to allow firearms on premises - 2 out of 2 possible points;
C) Colleges are not forced to allow firearms on campus - 2 out of 2 possible points.

What do you all think? Would a 0 have been better than a 9?

Huff9337 wrote:Why should a lawful citizen not be able to protect themself and there love ones in california? Sounds like you want to trash the second admendment in California.

It's called "satire". He was making a satirical remark. You know... like, "this did not happen, 'cause California's gun laws would have prevented it!"

Loosen up and get into the spirit of things!